I don't know if this is the right place to complain, but certainly moderation is a little bit questionable...
Months ago, my contributions to Fanart Backgrounds have been rejected for GTA Vice City. Was because they were Low Quality? Maybe Unofficial? Because of the source? To answer that, I can assure you that those were not the case.
I wanted to add and replace some Backgrounds, with OFFICIAL artwork, from the OFFICIAL sources, because it bothers me that some Backgrounds are actually low quality, and they do not represent the game as it should. Not to offend the artist, but this artwork doesn't represent the game, to be honest...
So I thought that I could upload official artwork, instead, so backgrounds would look better. So I made my contribution by replacing the previous artwork by this one, featuring Tommy Vercetti, the main protagonist of this game, drawn by Stephen Bliss , the Rockstar Games artist behind the iconic artworks of GTA and RDR2. But they were rejected... And yes, I left a comment explaining why of this change, about the official Rockstar Games sources... But still, I got rejected.
Why was this rejected? Because of this "No logo in BG" rule that I have never heard before, and even then I have uploaded BGs with logo before, and nobody pointed out this rule.
Oh, okay, I guess it's fine... But hey, then why others can upload FA Backgrounds with LOGOS???
I have made a lot of contributions, and I always cared for High Quality and Official sources. I have never been rejected before, but now it feels so wrong that this rule is not applying to everyone. The worst is that, even reporting this issue won't work, and some moderators reject what they think they should reject, and some times, it's not like that. I want moderation to be fairer, to know the context, to understand why a submission might work better.
Thank You Launchbox community for reading this, and I hope that my message can be answered, with all respect.