frasto90 Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 Been using Biz Hawk for a while now and i must say it runs most systems that I use and i find much easier to setup compared to Retroarch, most noticeable is setting up controls for each system is so much simpler with a GUI. Also i love that it can scan and find bios files and knows for which system! The guys that are developing this emulator are doing great work and i think with in time it can really rival retroarch! Anyone else been using this? would like to hear other peoples opinions and thoughts.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lordmonkus Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 BizHawk is indeed very nice and I would consider using it if it had the same shader support as Retroarch. It is also much more straight forward in setting up due to it's UI over Retroarch but once you get used to Retroarch's UI it isn't so bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SentaiBrad Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 Maybe because I've used BizHawk very little, but I find RetroArch to be the easier program to deal with. Setting up the controls is automatic, just plug in a controller it detects (which I would assume most people have by now). If BizHawk emulates a system better than RetroArch though, I would love to see it included in RA. That seems like an odd thing to say, until you realize that Mednafen is a multi-system emulator too, but that's in RA. Actually, those two are extremely close in the way that they act, so it may not be all that much of a stretch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lordmonkus Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 If you like the default auto control config Retroarch controller set up is obviously easier but if you want to change it it can be confusing at first. I'm not sure how many of BizHawks "cores" are written by the BizHawk team or how heavily modified by them there are but it seems that most of the cores are just based off the same emulation code so the differences in emulation is probably very little. Looking at it from the outside like I am it seems like there is a certain amount of overlap in cores and code. Obviously Retroarch uses code based on other emulators. BizHawk appears to have some of some of its cores based off the same code while some of its cores are their own. Mednafen also has cores which are in some cases based off other emulators code while some of it is their own Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SentaiBrad Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 Mednafen and RetroArch use, pretty much, the same exact set up too. The BIOS would need to go in to the proper location for Mednafen, but it's all the same. Same naming conventions and same versions. I wonder how much from BizHawk is similar? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lordmonkus Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 It's hard to say just how similar it is but if you have BizHawk look in the about panel of the UI and it shows the emulator cores and what they are based on or their own. Mednafens Wiki page has the info on its cores and shows which are their own code and which are based on others https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mednafen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.