JPCLive Posted Monday at 04:13 PM Posted Monday at 04:13 PM My Retroarch cores are not in the default location. RA itself is configured for this and the cores and games launch just fine from within RA. LaunchBox shows all the cores as missing in the emulator manager, and there doesn’t seem to be a way to point LB at where they are. As a result, none of the games that use RA will launch from LB. Anyone know of a workaround? Quote
JoeViking245 Posted Monday at 05:26 PM Posted Monday at 05:26 PM 52 minutes ago, JPCLive said: My Retroarch cores are not in the default location. RA itself is configured for this and the cores and games launch just fine from within RA. LaunchBox shows all the cores as missing in the emulator manager, and there doesn’t seem to be a way to point LB at where they are. As a result, none of the games that use RA will launch from LB. Are you pretty adamant about not having the cores in their default location? That is, are you adverse to having them in the cores folder? I know for myself, I do a bit of crazy customization for my emulators. But have never thought of moving the cores to a different location. As LaunchBox has made using RetroArch to be a near hands-free experience, it relies on several of its default settings. e.g. core location. 1 hour ago, JPCLive said: Anyone know of a workaround? There's [almost] always a way. For an atypical installation, you can use a custom command line in the games' emulator settings. Edit the game and in the Emulation section, check the box to Use Custom Command-line Parameters. Then below that, add -L path/to/your/cores/core_name.dll After confirming that works, then there's a Bulk Add/Remove Custom Command-line Parameters plugin that will allow you to add that to all games in that platform in one shot. Quote
JPCLive Posted Monday at 05:31 PM Author Posted Monday at 05:31 PM Thanks for the quick response. I suppose I could keep the cores in the default location, but if RA allows them to be moved then I would think it would be advantageous to allow LB to be able to find them wherever they are, no? I will attempt your solution a little later today. Thanks again. Quote
JoeViking245 Posted Monday at 05:40 PM Posted Monday at 05:40 PM 3 minutes ago, JPCLive said: Thanks for the quick response. I suppose I could keep the cores in the default location, but if RA allows them to be moved then I would think it would be advantageous to allow LB to be able to find them wherever they are, no? No problem. Though it does seem a bit niche, I'm sure you have a good reason. Beyond "because I can". You can always put in a Feature Request to integrate custom core locations. Feedback - LaunchBox Navigate to the link and click Create a new post. Quote
dragon57 Posted yesterday at 02:26 AM Posted yesterday at 02:26 AM Would you be adverse to just creating something like a hard link or junction back to the default location? I mess around with retroarch defaults all the time and have tried this successfully. Quote
JPCLive Posted yesterday at 02:52 AM Author Posted yesterday at 02:52 AM 26 minutes ago, dragon57 said: Would you be adverse to just creating something like a hard link or junction back to the default location? I mess around with retroarch defaults all the time and have tried this successfully. Sure. How do you do that? Quote
dragon57 Posted yesterday at 03:00 AM Posted yesterday at 03:00 AM I highly recommend this utility: https://schinagl.priv.at/nt/hardlinkshellext/linkshellextension.html I have used it for a number of years. While you can create everything manually in Windows, this util makes things easy. Quote
JPCLive Posted yesterday at 03:42 AM Author Posted yesterday at 03:42 AM Thanks. Will try this too. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.