Jump to content
LaunchBox Community Forums

Enverex

Members
  • Content count

    41
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

14 Good

About Enverex

  • Rank
    8-Bit Processor
  1. MS-DOS or Windows GameDB entry

    I don't agree on splitting Win 9x as that's still "Windows" would would require a large amount of reorganising for me and I assume many others (that are using the catchall of "Windows").
  2. MS-DOS or Windows GameDB entry

    *intents and purposes. Anyway, you shouldn't really see that many duplicated games unless those games were released twice, once as an MSDOS version and also again as a Windows version. Just because it's a DOS game that runs in Windows, doesn't make it a Windows game (e.g. lots of games from the Windows 95 and early 98 era).
  3. Moderation problems

    Is the ability to submit games from Launchbox itself now likely to have the downside of posting an overwhelming amount of bad or duplicated games? (unrelated to the issue diamond just mentioned).
  4. Moderation problems

    Moderation is a cumulative effort. Those details can be added once the game itself has been added. You may want to look into adding content rather than moderating then,
  5. Game Description Text Bug

    Cool. Nicely done Vlansix.
  6. Update: Alternate Titles

    One thing I've noticed (unless I'm blind) is that the Metadata download doesn't seem to include alternate titles anywhere. Any chance of getting that added?
  7. Is there a way to know why a game was rejected?

    That wouldn't really help, in this instance they did provide a link to the "duplicate". Except it was actually a different game with a similar name. Maybe a comments section on the submission itself for new games would be useful (like there is for individual content).
  8. Is there a way to know why a game was rejected?

    The lack of appeal is a problem too. I had 4 approvals and 5 rejections on a new game, with the rejections claiming it was a duplicate of another game (which it wasn't, it was a different game).
  9. Which emulator are you using for MAME

    I was using MAME in RetroArch, but switched to actual MAME due to things like vector games not being handled properly in RetroArch. That said, I can't get my controllers to work properly with the real MAME program whereas with RetroArch they "just worked" so I may end up having to switch back. Also most shaders are broken on real MAME on Linux.
  10. Retroarch Dolphin core

    Oh, that's new. I didn't realise they'd reached that point yet. Cool.
  11. Moderation problems

    Oh, just in case anyone isn't aware (because I only noticed this last week): If you need to replace an image, don't delete the old one and upload a new one. Click on the old one, to go Edit and then you can select a replacement image there instead. It means that the action only has to be approved once rather than two (apparently unrelated) actions of delete and then add. Also makes it clearer what's being replaced and why.
  12. Moderation problems

    Oh god it's so fast, I can't moderate that quickly!
  13. Fake Clear Logo / Wheel Art?

    Don't feel silly, I only figured that out a few weeks ago when I wondered why the hell the stuff I worked on looked so jagged! Hah.
  14. Retroarch Dolphin core

    Just a heads up, it's not a real core, it's just a wrapper for Dolphin so I'd very much advise against trying to get it to work right now as there really isn't much point.
  15. Moderation problems

    I forgot to mention, we can't reject the ones with invalid years. If you try and reject them, you get an Internal Server Error and (unlike in the case of the deletions, which despite the error do seem to save) it doesn't appear to have actually actioned it, as refreshing the moderation page will put you back on the same new game entry (with an invalid year). The only way to progress is to use the Ignore for 24 Hours option.
×