bundangdon

Yep! Consider it done

Thank you everyone! It's not that I want to completely change the way the rom-list scrolls permanently but it would be nice to have the selected rom "always centered" as an option. I'm sure some people like it the way it is now, but for some reason it just bugs me the way it scrolls all the way down (or up) like it's messing with my eyes

Here ya go https://bitbucket.org/jasondavidcarr/launchbox/issues/3195/feature-request-change-centered-titles-in

Thank you for the quick response! It's bitbucket Issue #3195 and hopefully @Jason Carr is reading this

I'm not sure if this has been mentioned before but it seems like a relatively simple request. I've always been more fond of the plain and simple 'vanilla' roms list. However, unlike the roms list with logos/wheels, it doesn't stay centered and always drops to the bottom. This isn't the case with other frontends, so I was wondering if it would be possible, as shown in the pictures below https://bitbucket.org/jasondavidcarr/launchbox/issues/3195/feature-request-change-centered-titles-in

Yep, I assumed that as well. It was a good effort but certainly could use some editing

Wow, quite a novel you wrote there

Also try MESS/MAME with Intellivision. It plays most of the games and for those which don't, there are the standalone emulators Bliss and Jzintv which should work with .int files

Also, I believe that Lakka is an operating system made with Linux, which means you wouldn't be able to port over launchbox/bigbox to it, (at least not yet) since it's not compatible with Linux (only Windows)

According to the specs, it will fit up to a 6.3" phone

For those who are interested, here is a demonstration video of the wee controller

The "Wee Controller' you mentioned seems very interesting and something worth investing in, possibly. I found it here https://www.amazon.com/Bounabay-Wireless-Telescopic-Bluetooth-Controller/dp/B01NBT9RFY/ref=pd_sbs_147_1?_encoding=UTF8&pd_rd_i=B01NBT9RFY&pd_rd_r=XM1BEJ4T0F8JSZ67168P&pd_rd_w=VG23k&pd_rd_wg=LfIjh&psc=1&refRID=XM1BEJ4T0F8JSZ67168P And sorry for that ridiculously long link

Oops! My mistake. I guess that it was only removed from the "sticky" (top) posts in the general message board, probably due to lack of activity

Nice! Great work once again

On a related note, I've just recently noticed that they also removed the long-running post "Do you like Hyperspin?" from their forums. The last time I checked (a few months ago), it was filled with (mostly) negative posts, with people complaining about the lack of hyperspin development and comparing it with the features available in other frontends. They definitely have a great "scene" with people doing some excellent work by providing artwork and themes, but if there's any progress being made on the program itself, I'll believe it when I see it

That's an excellent tutorial and after watching it, launchbox (with rocketlauncher) became my frontend of choice

Another quick update. I just added the dolphin core information to the retroarch module, which took about 30 seconds and it's working fine within rocketlauncher

You may need to change some of the configuration-settings for some of the emulators within the rocketlauncher ui, but I have the same module (1.36) and everything seems to be working fine here with retroarch 1.60. However, I haven't (yet) tried any of the newly added systems like vice, dolphin, etc.

Right! Another reason I use rocketlauncher is for the reason you just mentioned. There's so much media (bezels, fades, pause, etc.) available, that it makes the whole 'experience' feel even more complete But as it's also been mentioned here before, it's all a matter of preference. Also, the modules that rocketlauncher uses make for both an advantage and disadvantage. They make setting up an emulator relatively easier but if a module for a particular emulator doesn't exist (and there are a few) then you're unable to use that emulator unless you want to create your own module. Nevertheless, I still use rocketlauncher for nearly all of my systems within launchbox

Additionally, for almost all of the hyperspin users out there, having rocketlauncher available makes the transition to launchbox/bigbox a whole lot easier and smoother

Lordmonkus explained the features of rocketlauncher rather well and for those reasons/features which were mentioned, I continue to use it because rocketlauncher adds the "icing on the cake" to launchbox/bigbox. However, it does take a little extra time to set up and get accustomed to, yet it's simple enough for someone like me to figure out after a few attempts My suggestion would be that once you feel comfortable with your launchbox setup and are ready for more "icing" then give rocketlauncher a try

Not at the moment, sorry. I haven't set up CPS3 on launchbox yet. However, you can probably set it up (relatively) easily with the automatic playlist feature, after you have imported your mame roms

There's a standalone cps3 emulator? I believe that if you have a pretty decent system (fast cpu) then MAME would be the best choice. However, FBA and WinKawaks will also work, especially for the older, slower systems

Agreed. And if you could set this up with RocketLauncher, then you could basically use it with any frontend including launchbox, hyperspin. etc.

Thank you very much for sharing! You might want to specify whether these are for retroarch, rocketlauncher, etc.