cleverest

Hey everyone, I updated Demul from 0.58 which was working fine with it for Sammy Atomiswave, but with version 0.7 it broke...I noticed it was no longer -atomiswave but -awave now for the command line, after doing updating that, it now it launches games, but they look like this: Any ideas?

This is my DeSmuME "Running Hotkey Script" to go full screen and exit with ESC or by pressing L3: WinWaitActive , DeSmuME ; Send !{Enter} $Esc:: { Process, Close, {{{StartupEXE}}} } $joy9:: ; my L3 button { keywait, joy9, t2 if errorlevel <> 0 { Process, Close, {{{StartupEXE}}} ;closes emulator } } Note if nothing is going full screen with it, you just need to set it full screen once in a game and exit and I think it remembers is the next time, the script above may just be for ways to exit it.

The trojans are false positives... it has to do with how the crack works; modifies stuff in real-time. This is a known issue with the emulator, so you just have to adjust your anti virus exclusions... this is well known... check Google.

Good points...I guess I will just have to try it. ?

Thank you. I'll be sure to post how it goes/runs. ?

You might want to also post a request for this help in the Troubleshooting section so it's more visible.

Hi Everyone, I'm not trying to brag here, but I'll be acquiring one of these nice NAS's soon; I want to seriously expand my current 8TB LaunchBox collection to something even more jaw-dropping. (among other storage needs). I realize there is a performance hit with NAS vs. running on a local machine, but I'm hoping I can still make it perform well enough... Does anyone use this specific NAS with growing their Retro gaming collection? The ultimate goal is to have the biggest, most ridiculously complete collection running LB/BB as humanely known in all 9 planets, but I'm curious what the performance on this specific NAS is and perhaps some steps to set it up and optimize it, if you would be so kind. Thank you!

Cool. Anyway I can get your images ?

I appreciate that approach, but I'm just trying to get 1 rom only, I mean on all platforms though obviously, no betas, alt versions, and English only, unless Japanese only systems (EX: PCFX), or translated to English roms (over 350), and I'm at around 42k roms, can probably had a few thousand more total...not sure if there IS more than that though...

Does your collection include betas, duplicate versions of roms, like a1, a2, beta) and non-English titles (all languages, etc..?)

I checked out your massive LB file you sent - very impressive, but you DO have a lot of duplicate roms....I saw "revision1, revision2 of the same games, etc...", but still..if you are trying to be the ultimate rom completionist, you are on your way...

Haha, good luck getting that! Sounds cool though.

Thanks... I would be so nervous dealing with drive failures that I would lose so much of that...do you have it backed up somewhere? I'm considering a nice sized mirrored NAS

Damn man...I have a full 8TB, and I pride myself on it being 99.5% playable, no dupes, not beta, only english and translations to english.... BUT WOW....you running this on a NAS or the CLOUD?

Also ps4 and xbox one, and many switch, xbox 360 and xbox games do not play yet with emulators...curious what the playable total roms are if you have that worked out.

Not only English? Dupes versions? Betas, etc..? 30k steam? Wtf, do you own the company? What is the total drive size holding all this?

Does anyone know how to force Yuzu to use openGL (vs Vulkan) when running a specific game only? I have one game that crashes with Vulkan but works fine with OpenGL....something through the command line option maybe?

Same Wikipedia issue here too.

This happens while loading contents of the image folder.....it tells me to check the permissions. The OWNER of this folder is listed as "account unknown" - I need to change this, but I have a couple computers, and don't want to limit this collection to my desktop. What IS the correct default owner of the Launchbox folder? Is it Administrator, trusted installer, or something else?

Logically maybe somebody hates a specific platform and never wants to see it listed again in their installation; hence "permanent". I think that's more than reasonable of an assumption given the language used. Anyways, I have my answer.

Logically would be to accept permanent as not permanent? That depends on the definitions of words, doesn't it? Thank you for clarifying Jason.